Strange Times. City of Boulder Election Edition 2026. All the News That’s Fit to Vote.
Download PDF

Page 7 of 8

The wrong kind of infrastructure

Boulder has more than doubled its communications staff since 2019. Its police force is smaller, and its police headquarters leaks.

BOULDER, Colo. Since 2019, the City of Boulder has more than doubled the number of people it employs to communicate with the public. Over the same period, its police department has gotten smaller.

The buildings behind the city’s emergency response have been left to wear out. By the city’s own account, its police headquarters and two of its fire stations are failing, and the police building has no funded replacement. When city staff move into their new consolidated offices next year, every department will be housed there except two: police and fire.

Violent and property crime in Boulder have both fallen in recent years, in line with trends across Colorado. The question is what the city has chosen to invest in, and who it has chosen to hire, while the basics of public safety wore out.

MORE MESSENGERS

In 2019, Boulder’s communications department had about 15 full-time positions, according to city budget figures compiled by PLAN-Boulder. By 2025 it had 33, an increase of 116 percent. In 2015, it had eight and a half.

The city manager’s office grew 84 percent over the same stretch. Citywide, staffing rose from about 1,426 full-time positions in 2019 to about 1,548 in this year’s budget, and the cost of personnel rose from $149 million to $205 million between 2019 and 2025.

The city has said part of the communications growth came from pulling communications staff out of individual departments into one central office. Even so, Boulder now employs more city workers per resident than most of its peers. Among 22 college towns and similar cities compared by PLAN-Boulder using their own budget documents, Boulder ranked in the top five.

FEWER OFFICERS

The police department went the other direction. It had about 288 full-time positions in 2019 and about 281 in this year’s budget, a count that includes civilian staff and, for part of that period, code enforcement workers transferred in from another department.

Fire-Rescue grew over the same period, from 123 positions to about 140, largely to staff a new station.

THE BUILDINGS THAT RESPOND

At police headquarters, according to city materials, the heating, electrical and plumbing systems have outlived their expected lifespan. Leaks are frequent enough to raise concerns about mold, and leaking lines have forced invasive repairs through the ceilings. The main sewer line, original to the building, is corroding. The elevator is often out of order. The building’s layout and size no longer fit how the department works.

The city estimates a replacement at $170 million, at a site it hasn’t chosen, and says it has no other plan to fund one.

At Fire Stations 1 and 5, the city says, the original windows in the sleeping quarters no longer seal, letting in water and cold air faster than the heat can keep up. The boiler and roof are at the end of their life. Neither station can properly keep carcinogens from contaminated gear out of the kitchens and bathrooms firefighters live in during their shifts. At Station 5, leaking pipes rotted floor beams badly enough that they had to be repaired.

Fixing both stations would cost about $7 million, according to the city.

GOALS WITHOUT DEADLINES

In 2020, Boulder Fire-Rescue’s master plan set two response targets to reach by 2022, including cutting the time for the first advanced life support provider to reach the most serious medical calls from 10 minutes, 46 seconds to 8 minutes, measured at the 90th percentile.

The city’s 2025 budget lists the same goals, starting from the same times. The deadline is gone, and the budget doesn’t say whether either target has been met.

CONNECTIONS

In its budget, the city describes the guiding principle of its communications department as “Creating Connections for a Thriving Community and Democracy.”

At police headquarters, the city says, the elevator is often out of order.

Stan Garnett issues open letter supporting Aquiles La Grave for mayor

Portrait of Stan Garnett.

After almost 18 years in Boulder County elected office (School Board and DA), I have largely kept my opinions on local matters to myself, with the exception of an occasional client who asks me to interact with authorities.

However, I have been dismayed to watch the growing budget crisis in the City of Boulder. The fiscal situation is reaching a crisis level, as indicated by the City’s financial reports and the extraordinary request for a half-billion-dollar bond measure to address facilities issues that have grown through decades of inattention.

The number one obligation of elected Council members is to assure the fiscal health of the City so that other goals (public safety, parks, transportation, equity, management of the unhoused, etc.) can receive appropriate support. When current members of Council are questioned, they have sloughed the problem off on staff, saying “we are a weak council and must let staff function without interference.” That is nonsense. The citizens of Boulder do not elect staff; we elect Council. Staff work for Council, directly or derivatively. The voters of Boulder deserve a Council and Mayor who will assert themselves and make sure staff answers to them. To say that Alpine-Balsam could be extravagantly developed without a budget, or that an auditor is not needed, or that close fiscal management is not the role of Council, is a recipe for what we now are facing. Council must cut back on the time it spends debating foreign policy, or fantasizing that the City of Boulder can singlehandedly solve global warming, or micromanaging the police department, and focus on getting the City’s fiscal house in order.

Now, let me be clear: I like all our current council members and our Mayor and our staff. They are all fine people, and I, better than most, know how hard their jobs are. But because I know we need to change the culture of Council’s interaction with staff, I will be supporting Aquiles La Grave for mayor and Benita Duran for Council. Aquiles speaks frankly and without nuance about the City’s fiscal and public safety issues and understands the leadership that the Mayor should provide. I have known Benita since my years at Fairview High School, and she will bring a fresh and strong voice to Council. I will vote for some of the incumbents as well, but we need to send the right message this election.

City Council members must ask tough questions: of themselves, of each other, of the public … and certainly of their staff.

Stan Garnett